Sunday, June 29, 2014

Games people play...

As part of the Connect Learning MOOC I am participating in this summer, we are exploring many ways we can connect our teaching through technology, making, tinkering, writing, or what-ever we can create.  

#clmooc — Making Learning Connected

This week we are exploring using games and play.  In my life, "games" meant Board Games, usually Monopoly, Life or Sorry, the games that came out during the rainy days at the shore, during hurricanes when it really wasn't safe to be sailing, after a family gathering, after dessert; games are a very important family tradition.  It was not my experience to see "games" as electronic (maybe because Atari hadn't been invented yet).  Last year during this MOOC one idea that came up was "tinkering" with the "rules" of a game.  I loved the idea so much that I went to a few yard sales, purchased a few games and brought them into my classroom.  My goal this year was to give the games to the students and have them create new rules, combine games, or whatever.  What I got though was a group of students who wanted to play "old school", using the originally designed rules.

I had the pleasure of sharing my classroom during "Homeroom" and the game of SORRY was discovered the first day of the school year.  It was fun to watch a group of 8th grade boys run into the classroom to get a game started before the day began at 8 AM. This behavior continued the entire year, with some true strategies for success being designed.

I am a firm believer that games are important in a class which has the title "Skills for Life" because of the social skills and ethical behavior that is learned through the process of "playing".  Students become engrossed in the game, learn how to deal with success as well as defeat.  When the period ends, they have engaged in a social experience that will benefit them in the future - just don't tell them that - let them think it is for FUN!

Tuesday, June 24, 2014

Old School... Really?

This past week Michelle Obama stated that we need to find a way to teach children how to prepare their own food as another way to eating healthy. Check out the WSJ piece: Old School.  She went on to say that we can't call it "Home Ec" because of the "bad" connotation.

So here are my questions to her:
1.  Are you aware of the thousands of Family and Consumer Science educators who are doing just as you requested on a daily basis, with dwindling budgets and support?

2.  How will you fund after-school projects when students don't want to stay after? or they are too busy with sports? or they need to take care of their siblings?

3.  Why do we need to re-invent the wheel - for 100 years Family & Consumer Science (Home Ec) has been working in the schools to educate our future adults?

4.  What will you be doing to help keep Perkins funding that funds these programs?

 If you want a team to support your Let's Move and Eating Healthy campaigns, you already have us, trained and working.  We are in the trenches, working hard to reach your goals, while at the same time trying to save our programs from the cuts that come when funds need to move to testing initiatives.  

Mrs. Obama, please do not tell me that Home Ec has a "bad connotation", or that we are "old school".  We are teaching these "Healthy Eating" mandates daily, while combining decision making, resource management, career exploration; you know, those life skills needed to turn all of into self reliant citizens.  Come see our classes, I don't think there is a FCS teacher who would not want to show off what they are doing in the classroom; just be prepared to work hard!